Comments on: carter and matthews brainstorm on historic parallels

By: travis’ favorites, year two :: all-encompassingly :: blog

travis’ favorites, year two :: all-encompassingly :: blog — Mon, 01 Jan 2007 08:45:38 +0000

[...] *carter and matthews brainstorm on historic parallels (one of the most outrageously idiotic and unrestrained free-for-alls in modern television history–explained) [...]

By: all-encompassingly » revisionist historian, jimmy carter, reveals his philosophy:: blog

Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:08:27 +0000

[...] recall some of his remarks on hardball two years ago: [...]

By: doug

doug — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

(carter–who is hereby struck from the historical record. as far as i’m concerned, he was never president. in fact, he never existed. one good revisionist historian deserves another)

The best line on the blog in many, many moons.

By: Peggy Snow Cahill

Peggy Snow Cahill — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

I agree wholeheartedly! I was astounded to hear such a comment about the Revolutionary War, even out of his mouth. And about the Canada thing…well, I am married to a Newfoundlander, and lived up there for a couple of years (Nova Scotia), and although I love the country and the people, I did not like the way they are still subjects of the Queen. Nothing against the Queen, mind you, but I am glad that when the people here asked George Washington to be their king, he said “we don’t need no stinkin’ king!” (or words to that effect). I don’t think I would be comfortable becoming a Canadian citizen, for at least one reason: I could not swear allegience to the Queen of England. Got too much rebellious American patriot blood in me, I guess! (although actually several of my ancestors were loyalists in the war! oh well!) Keep up the great work; you are an inspiration to me and I am sure many many others!
Peggy

By: kyer

kyer — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

Doug, I second that.

By: Al

Al — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

WOW!! I mean wow! That is amazing that they would be so bold. Talk about cajones… comparing the rev. war to that of the insurgents… right!
I love that they thought the revolutionary war was “unnecessary.” But hey, they are right. I mean, we could have just gone on taking it up the back side. There was no need to get all bent out of shape over that. And I am sure that Carter and Matthews would have been fine not having all the wealth that this country has because of its independance. Canada, India, and Austrailia sure are rich! I am sure we would have been fine. Especially since that would have meant that England would have controlled pretty much the entire world.
Great post!!

By: Whatsakyer? Animal? Vegetable? Mineral?

Whatsakyer? Animal? Vegetable? Mineral? — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

Sign #621 that Jimmy Carter has checked out of the

Travis of the all-too-groovy All-Encompassingly expands on Carter and Matthew’s liberal lunacy regarding what should have been a peaceful alternative reality to the oh-so-unnecessary Revolutionary War.

Travis: “Carter–[sic] is hereby struck from …