all-encompassingly

Back in 2004 the Obamessiah denounced speculation that he would save America in 2008 because he was a “believer in knowing what you’re doing”.

Watching Ron Paul attempt to explain why he won’t debate his primary election opponent for his congressional seat.

As Dr. Richard Kimball would say, sweetastic.

Chris Matthews humiliates Obama’s supporter, then Hillary’s gal says that Clinton has “legislative accomplishments all across the world”, and then uber-liberal unbiased Keith Olbermann cross examines Matthews.

 
As to Olbermann’s point, off the top of my head I can think of a bunch of stuff that the Senate has done in the past seven years: [...]

i meant to post this a couple of weeks ago. the goal is the result of an amazing individual effort by nash with under 30 ticks to play in the game.

what the following video lacks in sound, it makes up for in crispness and detail:

I think a lot of Obama’s appeal to me is due to the fact that he is sticking it to the Clintons.
Nonetheless, the guy is exceptionally inspirational.
Here’s the currently uber-popular music video version of the speech:

challenge: “name one accomplishment of barack obama’s”
supporters: [crickets]
contrast this to mitt romney’s impressive list of accomplishments.

mitt romney got everyone in massachusetts health insurance without raising taxes by using free market solutions.
mitt romney reversed negative budget and unemployment trends in massachusetts, creating a billion dollar budget surplus and moving new jobs into the state at a [...]

romney? no, it is john mccain, of course.

kudos to dan abrams, who hits the nail on the head with his comments that bookend these video clips.

Ladies and gentlemen, Jews and Gentiles, I give you…
Jackie Mason on John McCain.

Wow.

 
Can’t say I particularly disagree with the analysis. I’m not quite to the point of voting for Hillary over McCain, but I certainly think that she would get fewer liberal bills through congress than McCain would.