<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNN: &#8220;we picked sides a long time ago and we don&#8217;t care who notices!&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.all-encompassingly.com/cnn-ann-coulter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.all-encompassingly.com/cnn-ann-coulter/</link>
	<description>we still remember mitch hedberg</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:39:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: travis&#8217; favorites, year three :: all-encompassingly :: blog</title>
		<link>http://www.all-encompassingly.com/cnn-ann-coulter/comment-page-1/#comment-30269</link>
		<dc:creator>travis&#8217; favorites, year three :: all-encompassingly :: blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 21:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.all-encompassingly.com/cnn-we-picked-sides-a-long-time-ago-and-we-dont-care-who-notices/#comment-30269</guid>
		<description>[...] CNN: &#8220;we picked sides a long time ago, and we don&#8217;t care who notices &#8212; and pretty much everyone&#8217;s noticed&#8230;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CNN: &#8220;we picked sides a long time ago, and we don&#8217;t care who notices &#8212; and pretty much everyone&#8217;s noticed&#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bush: &#8220;we will {{flush}} the chocolate city&#8221; :: all-encompassingly :: blog</title>
		<link>http://www.all-encompassingly.com/cnn-ann-coulter/comment-page-1/#comment-30253</link>
		<dc:creator>bush: &#8220;we will {{flush}} the chocolate city&#8221; :: all-encompassingly :: blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 20:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.all-encompassingly.com/cnn-we-picked-sides-a-long-time-ago-and-we-dont-care-who-notices/#comment-30253</guid>
		<description>[...] CNN: &#8216;we picked sides a long time ago and we don&#8217;t care who notices&#8217; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CNN: &#8216;we picked sides a long time ago and we don&#8217;t care who notices&#8217; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Korla Pundit</title>
		<link>http://www.all-encompassingly.com/cnn-ann-coulter/comment-page-1/#comment-6420</link>
		<dc:creator>Korla Pundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 22:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.all-encompassingly.com/cnn-we-picked-sides-a-long-time-ago-and-we-dont-care-who-notices/#comment-6420</guid>
		<description>&gt;As long as youâ€™re pointing out the bias of CNN, should someone take the time to point out the opposite bias from FoxNews?

You do know the difference between commentary/opinion shows and news, don&#039; t you? The news portion of Fox is actually very non-conservative. Unless you can point out a single biased piece of reporting. And again, by reporting, I don&#039;t mean somebody&#039;s opinion from a debate show, or O&#039;Reilly&#039;s schtick. That&#039;s not news, and doesn&#039;t pretend to be unbiased. Unlike CNN, NY Times, NPR, BBC, etc, etc.

Similarly, on WABC in New York, the commentators are more conservative than liberal, but when it cuts to the news (ABC News), which is supposed to be unbiased, it&#039;s as anti-Bush as it gets.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;As long as youâ€™re pointing out the bias of CNN, should someone take the time to point out the opposite bias from FoxNews?</p>
<p>You do know the difference between commentary/opinion shows and news, don&#8217; t you? The news portion of Fox is actually very non-conservative. Unless you can point out a single biased piece of reporting. And again, by reporting, I don&#8217;t mean somebody&#8217;s opinion from a debate show, or O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s schtick. That&#8217;s not news, and doesn&#8217;t pretend to be unbiased. Unlike CNN, NY Times, NPR, BBC, etc, etc.</p>
<p>Similarly, on WABC in New York, the commentators are more conservative than liberal, but when it cuts to the news (ABC News), which is supposed to be unbiased, it&#8217;s as anti-Bush as it gets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Notta Libb</title>
		<link>http://www.all-encompassingly.com/cnn-ann-coulter/comment-page-1/#comment-5711</link>
		<dc:creator>Notta Libb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 09:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.all-encompassingly.com/cnn-we-picked-sides-a-long-time-ago-and-we-dont-care-who-notices/#comment-5711</guid>
		<description>Check out a funny site dedicated to the absurdity and satire nature of saying â€œItâ€™s All George Bushâ€™s Fault!&quot;

http://www.iagbf.com
http://www.itsallgeorgebushsfault.com

I hope that you don&#039;t think this is spam. I really do think that you&#039;d appreciate a site like this since we share the same idealogy. Hopefully you like it enough to blogroll :)

Regards,
Notta Libb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out a funny site dedicated to the absurdity and satire nature of saying â€œItâ€™s All George Bushâ€™s Fault!&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.iagbf.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.iagbf.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.itsallgeorgebushsfault.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.itsallgeorgebushsfault.com</a></p>
<p>I hope that you don&#8217;t think this is spam. I really do think that you&#8217;d appreciate a site like this since we share the same idealogy. Hopefully you like it enough to blogroll <img src='http://www.all-encompassingly.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Notta Libb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WORFEUS</title>
		<link>http://www.all-encompassingly.com/cnn-ann-coulter/comment-page-1/#comment-5483</link>
		<dc:creator>WORFEUS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.all-encompassingly.com/cnn-we-picked-sides-a-long-time-ago-and-we-dont-care-who-notices/#comment-5483</guid>
		<description>What the kids at the University of Connecitcut did was stupid, and Coulter should have called them stupid. 

If they can&#039;t let her speak, and then debate her with reason and logic, then they are stupid.

I for one would be happy however to take Ann out for a ride, and drop her off somewhere between her Mein Kampf rhetoric and die neu tausand jarh reich she is so loyally helping to build.

Tell Coulter WORFEUS is here, and he is all ears.

:&#124;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the kids at the University of Connecitcut did was stupid, and Coulter should have called them stupid. </p>
<p>If they can&#8217;t let her speak, and then debate her with reason and logic, then they are stupid.</p>
<p>I for one would be happy however to take Ann out for a ride, and drop her off somewhere between her Mein Kampf rhetoric and die neu tausand jarh reich she is so loyally helping to build.</p>
<p>Tell Coulter WORFEUS is here, and he is all ears.</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.all-encompassingly.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_neutral.gif' alt=':|' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abuzachary</title>
		<link>http://www.all-encompassingly.com/cnn-ann-coulter/comment-page-1/#comment-5463</link>
		<dc:creator>abuzachary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2005 07:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.all-encompassingly.com/cnn-we-picked-sides-a-long-time-ago-and-we-dont-care-who-notices/#comment-5463</guid>
		<description>He has a hot link blocker. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He has a hot link blocker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: travis</title>
		<link>http://www.all-encompassingly.com/cnn-ann-coulter/comment-page-1/#comment-5419</link>
		<dc:creator>travis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2005 16:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.all-encompassingly.com/cnn-we-picked-sides-a-long-time-ago-and-we-dont-care-who-notices/#comment-5419</guid>
		<description>here&#039;s is a video without commentary:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://thepoliticalteen.com/video/coulterbashed.wmv&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;thepoliticalteen.com/video/coulterbashed.wmv&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>here&#8217;s is a video without commentary:  <a href="http://thepoliticalteen.com/video/coulterbashed.wmv" rel="nofollow">thepoliticalteen.com/video/coulterbashed.wmv</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: travis</title>
		<link>http://www.all-encompassingly.com/cnn-ann-coulter/comment-page-1/#comment-5405</link>
		<dc:creator>travis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 23:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.all-encompassingly.com/cnn-we-picked-sides-a-long-time-ago-and-we-dont-care-who-notices/#comment-5405</guid>
		<description>yeah, i actually only saw the first few seconds of the video because the stream wasn&#039;t working for me. 

but you have a good point.  sean hannity has really annoyed me for a long time.  i don&#039;t get the sense that he is much of a &quot;thinker,&quot; his TV and radio interview style is annoying, and though i bought one of his books a few years ago in a moment of need at an airport, and i never got past page 20 or so.  so you&#039;re right about sean.  

ann also seems to have fallen into a bit of a rut in her TV appearances, completely giving up on the customary pleasantries and politeness that people expect.  her attitude on these shows is more fitting for the bar with some other political insiders than on TV.  it&#039;s probably been a while since she&#039;s actually prepared for an interview.  

at the same time, i don&#039;t think people expect unbiased news from &quot;hannity &amp; colmes.&quot;  it&#039;s a political &lt;em&gt;debate&lt;/em&gt; show with a righty and a &quot;lefty.&quot;  people who tune into &quot;hannity &amp; colmes,&quot; know what they&#039;re in for.

you don&#039;t expect that type of party &quot;shilling&quot; going on at CNN&#039;s website, or on a straightforward news broadcast (even at fox news!).  yet this is exactly what CNN gave us.  their title--and probably the whole article--would be better suited for a liberal blog somewhere.  that&#039;s what really caught caught my eye. i wonder why it didn&#039;t catch the eye of the CNN editor.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, i actually only saw the first few seconds of the video because the stream wasn&#8217;t working for me. </p>
<p>but you have a good point.  sean hannity has really annoyed me for a long time.  i don&#8217;t get the sense that he is much of a &#8220;thinker,&#8221; his TV and radio interview style is annoying, and though i bought one of his books a few years ago in a moment of need at an airport, and i never got past page 20 or so.  so you&#8217;re right about sean.  </p>
<p>ann also seems to have fallen into a bit of a rut in her TV appearances, completely giving up on the customary pleasantries and politeness that people expect.  her attitude on these shows is more fitting for the bar with some other political insiders than on TV.  it&#8217;s probably been a while since she&#8217;s actually prepared for an interview.  </p>
<p>at the same time, i don&#8217;t think people expect unbiased news from &#8220;hannity &amp; colmes.&#8221;  it&#8217;s a political <em>debate</em> show with a righty and a &#8220;lefty.&#8221;  people who tune into &#8220;hannity &amp; colmes,&#8221; know what they&#8217;re in for.</p>
<p>you don&#8217;t expect that type of party &#8220;shilling&#8221; going on at CNN&#8217;s website, or on a straightforward news broadcast (even at fox news!).  yet this is exactly what CNN gave us.  their title&#8211;and probably the whole article&#8211;would be better suited for a liberal blog somewhere.  that&#8217;s what really caught caught my eye. i wonder why it didn&#8217;t catch the eye of the CNN editor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://www.all-encompassingly.com/cnn-ann-coulter/comment-page-1/#comment-5382</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 18:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.all-encompassingly.com/cnn-we-picked-sides-a-long-time-ago-and-we-dont-care-who-notices/#comment-5382</guid>
		<description>As long as you&#039;re pointing out the bias of CNN, should someone take the time to point out the opposite bias from FoxNews?  

The Hannity &amp; Colmes clip you provided a link to was nothing but an arrogant exchange of rhetoric between Sean Hannity and Ann Coulter.  All they kept saying back and forth with each other was how liberals are in total meltdown, and how they&#039;re falling into disillusioned puppetry, with &#039;extreme leftists&#039; as the puppet masters; while conservatives are smart, put-together, and independent thinkers.  

This kind of rhetoric just adds to the polarization of American politics, and offers nothing productive.  True, CNN&#039;s headline was stupid, but you have to look at the Foxnews interview with the same critiquing eye.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as you&#8217;re pointing out the bias of CNN, should someone take the time to point out the opposite bias from FoxNews?  </p>
<p>The Hannity &amp; Colmes clip you provided a link to was nothing but an arrogant exchange of rhetoric between Sean Hannity and Ann Coulter.  All they kept saying back and forth with each other was how liberals are in total meltdown, and how they&#8217;re falling into disillusioned puppetry, with &#8216;extreme leftists&#8217; as the puppet masters; while conservatives are smart, put-together, and independent thinkers.  </p>
<p>This kind of rhetoric just adds to the polarization of American politics, and offers nothing productive.  True, CNN&#8217;s headline was stupid, but you have to look at the Foxnews interview with the same critiquing eye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
