<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fasting&#8230;Cindy Sheehan Style!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.all-encompassingly.com/fasting-cindy-sheehan-style/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.all-encompassingly.com/fasting-cindy-sheehan-style/</link>
	<description>we still remember mitch hedberg</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:12:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: another peace activist wants to kill george bush :: all-encompassingly :: blog</title>
		<link>http://www.all-encompassingly.com/fasting-cindy-sheehan-style/comment-page-1/#comment-55020</link>
		<dc:creator>another peace activist wants to kill george bush :: all-encompassingly :: blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 09:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.all-encompassingly.com/fastingcindy-sheehan-style/#comment-55020</guid>
		<description>[...] i guess if peace activist, cindy sheehan, can &#8220;fast&#8221; while gulping down 900-calorie protein smoothies, nobel peace prize winner betty williams can give a keynote speech on nonviolence if, therein, she advocates the peaceful murder of george bush. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] i guess if peace activist, cindy sheehan, can &#8220;fast&#8221; while gulping down 900-calorie protein smoothies, nobel peace prize winner betty williams can give a keynote speech on nonviolence if, therein, she advocates the peaceful murder of george bush. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: four years of insults :: all-encompassingly :: blog</title>
		<link>http://www.all-encompassingly.com/fasting-cindy-sheehan-style/comment-page-1/#comment-30293</link>
		<dc:creator>four years of insults :: all-encompassingly :: blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 23:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.all-encompassingly.com/fastingcindy-sheehan-style/#comment-30293</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8211;Steve Valentine (commenting as &#8220;Anonymous&#8221;) July 2006 [link and link and link and link and link] you [are mistaken in assuming] that the rest of the world is blind and you apparently see things pretty clearly. very ignorant simplification&#8230;.Polarizing posts like these are [unhelpful], but Iâ€™ve come to expect such from this blog&#8230;.monochrome posts like these are rarely worth the pixels they use. you are affected with paintbrush syndrome. Hey, stop using AM talk show host tactics. It never failsâ€¦ when you canâ€™t counter an argument intelligently, start calling names&#8230;.you have no brain to assimilate new information, you keep spewing out the same kind of mindless word drool no matter what sort of facts you have to ignore along the way. Youâ€™re walking on weak legs [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211;Steve Valentine (commenting as &#8220;Anonymous&#8221;) July 2006 [link and link and link and link and link] you [are mistaken in assuming] that the rest of the world is blind and you apparently see things pretty clearly. very ignorant simplification&#8230;.Polarizing posts like these are [unhelpful], but Iâ€™ve come to expect such from this blog&#8230;.monochrome posts like these are rarely worth the pixels they use. you are affected with paintbrush syndrome. Hey, stop using AM talk show host tactics. It never failsâ€¦ when you canâ€™t counter an argument intelligently, start calling names&#8230;.you have no brain to assimilate new information, you keep spewing out the same kind of mindless word drool no matter what sort of facts you have to ignore along the way. Youâ€™re walking on weak legs [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curtis</title>
		<link>http://www.all-encompassingly.com/fasting-cindy-sheehan-style/comment-page-1/#comment-13255</link>
		<dc:creator>Curtis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 22:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.all-encompassingly.com/fastingcindy-sheehan-style/#comment-13255</guid>
		<description>Ryan said:  &quot;The Israelis are showing us right now what to do with terrorists.&quot;

Yes, use them in their military.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan said:  &#8220;The Israelis are showing us right now what to do with terrorists.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, use them in their military.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curtis</title>
		<link>http://www.all-encompassingly.com/fasting-cindy-sheehan-style/comment-page-1/#comment-13250</link>
		<dc:creator>Curtis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 21:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.all-encompassingly.com/fastingcindy-sheehan-style/#comment-13250</guid>
		<description>Ryan said:  &quot;The Israelis are showing us right now what to do with terrorists.&quot;

Yes, use them in their military.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan said:  &#8220;The Israelis are showing us right now what to do with terrorists.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, use them in their military.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.all-encompassingly.com/fasting-cindy-sheehan-style/comment-page-1/#comment-13015</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 03:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.all-encompassingly.com/fastingcindy-sheehan-style/#comment-13015</guid>
		<description>Travis,

You got it.  You mustâ€™ve known from the alias Lester Goozman.  When nobody said anything, I thought I would play it out a while.  I did try to not sound like myself.  I even said I wasnâ€™t a believer to see if I could throw you off.  I think youâ€™ve known all along.

Sorry for the threadjack.  I have a grant due on Aug. 1.  Stress makes me hypersensitive.
Carry on with the Cindy bashing.  I wonâ€™t bother you.

I do love Doug&#039;s Zidane vs. Castro though!  My Cuban colleague and I had great laughs at that.

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Travis,</p>
<p>You got it.  You mustâ€™ve known from the alias Lester Goozman.  When nobody said anything, I thought I would play it out a while.  I did try to not sound like myself.  I even said I wasnâ€™t a believer to see if I could throw you off.  I think youâ€™ve known all along.</p>
<p>Sorry for the threadjack.  I have a grant due on Aug. 1.  Stress makes me hypersensitive.<br />
Carry on with the Cindy bashing.  I wonâ€™t bother you.</p>
<p>I do love Doug&#8217;s Zidane vs. Castro though!  My Cuban colleague and I had great laughs at that.</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: travis</title>
		<link>http://www.all-encompassingly.com/fasting-cindy-sheehan-style/comment-page-1/#comment-13012</link>
		<dc:creator>travis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 02:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.all-encompassingly.com/fastingcindy-sheehan-style/#comment-13012</guid>
		<description>mr. anan, you&#039;ve got this weird sense of humor.  kind of like a friend of mine named steve.  do you know him?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mr. anan, you&#8217;ve got this weird sense of humor.  kind of like a friend of mine named steve.  do you know him?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.all-encompassingly.com/fasting-cindy-sheehan-style/comment-page-1/#comment-13011</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 02:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.all-encompassingly.com/fastingcindy-sheehan-style/#comment-13011</guid>
		<description>Amin: 

â€œso the definition of â€œfastâ€ is: whenever someone says s/he is fasting, itâ€™s a fast?â€

Sure why not.  Did God die and let you decide what a fast is?  I missed that memo.  If someone feels they are sacrificing something and they call it a fast, who am I to disagree.

Jared the subway guyâ€™s diet would be a fast for me but I know that it would do me a lot of good.  Lot of research out there showing caloric restriction slows down the aging process.

I havenâ€™t taken the ludicrous position that Cindy Sheehan canâ€™t be criticized.  Iâ€™ve taken the position that your criticism (a la Coultergeist) is ludicrous.  Cindy believes she is fasting and making a statement.  Who are you to tell her that she isnâ€™t especially since youâ€™ve been affected as much as she has been by this war? 

â€œhow dare you say that! her brother was a transvestite and died of AIDS! she is therefore beyond criticism for her gender identity.â€ 

Now you get the point!  I still want to know if sheâ€™s working or walking.  Now you see when I criticize someone you respect how it hits a nerve.

â€œbut youâ€™ve missed the key part: itâ€™s still a MAJORITYâ€

Youâ€™ve missed the key part.  It was a majority.  Ainâ€™t no more!  Again letâ€™s see what happens in the midterms.  Maybe you guys should get Pete Coors to move to some State where Republicans are in trouble.

â€œmr. anan, youâ€™ve certainly got me all tangled up in your logic.â€ 

At least my arguments are logical.  See above.

â€œa lot of french now thinkâ€¦â€

The difference was Clinton had faulty intelligence.  Bush created it.  Watch the frontline special.  Cheney pushed on George Tenet to produce the intelligence the administration wanted (i.e., the slam dunk case).  Bush even knew the intelligence about the yellow cake was flawed before he gave his state of the union address.  He knew all of the intelligence was flawed.  He is a liar.  Watch the frontline special.  Stop removing your brain from your head and believing as only a right wing nut job does.  Develop some critical thinking skills.

â€œbut thatâ€™s why weâ€™ve got to get saddam a good legal defense team and get him off the hook for genocide.â€

If you donâ€™t understand the significance of the Nuremberg trials and how they benefited the US (despite the risk) you really should study World History.
 
â€œthen iâ€™d wan to find out who lied, so i would be sure not to support them.â€

Bush lied.  Iâ€™ll get rid of anyone responsible for the leak, the yellow cake example, the aluminum centrifuge tubes, etc. etc. etc.  Critical thinking comes in handy. 

â€œon a related note, did you defend bill clinton his brief bout with perjury?â€

No I didnâ€™t.  He should have been impeached.  So should Bush for lying and costing the American people so much.

â€œnothing. letâ€™s have fish smoothies for everyone!â€

Great. You buy.

Doug:
â€œ1. Check out Code Pinkâ€™s fasting guidelines. These are the feminist nuts behind this fast/rolling fast nonsense. Even by their standardâ€™s Cindy Sheehanâ€™s â€œfastâ€ is a joke.â€

Explain the logic.  You give credibility to what Code Pink says and then you call them feminist nuts.  Explain the incongruity.

â€œ2. Has Bush accepted the Kyoto protocol? Uh, no.â€

Uh where were you during the 2000 elections.  He said he would support the Kyoto Protocol.  Again, he lied.

â€œ3. Michael Moore hates America and Americans. (The underlined blue text is a hyperlink. You can click on it and visit a page with additional information and evidence.)â€

Right wing propaganda.  You have to ignore this stuff.  Stick to the facts to develop critical thinking skills.
â€œ4. Youâ€™re obsession with â€œEDâ€ is amusing.â€

No actually, I find hypocritical junkies like Rush Limbaugh amusing.

â€œ5. You present a compelling argument for mandatory military service and/or a requirement that any civilian who oversees military affairs must have served previously.â€

Thatâ€™s funny.  I donâ€™t remember doing that.  But one could imagine that civilian leadership might consult one who has served instead of making decisions based on what Karl Roveâ€™s brain says that day.

â€œ6. Yes. Israel has been fighting Islamic terrorism for â€œa little overâ€ 3,000 years. Quite a feat considering Mohammed was born around 570 AD, â€œa little underâ€ 3,000 years ago.â€

I donâ€™t think you read above.  The wikipedia entry was for terrorism not Islamic terrorism.  You seem to have an fetish for Islam.  Something you care to tell us.  I was actually assuming that Moses came around before 1000 BC.  I may be wrong, Iâ€™m not a scriptorian like you Doug.  Anyway, you missed my point.  They have been fighting terrorism for more than 3000 years.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amin: </p>
<p>â€œso the definition of â€œfastâ€ is: whenever someone says s/he is fasting, itâ€™s a fast?â€</p>
<p>Sure why not.  Did God die and let you decide what a fast is?  I missed that memo.  If someone feels they are sacrificing something and they call it a fast, who am I to disagree.</p>
<p>Jared the subway guyâ€™s diet would be a fast for me but I know that it would do me a lot of good.  Lot of research out there showing caloric restriction slows down the aging process.</p>
<p>I havenâ€™t taken the ludicrous position that Cindy Sheehan canâ€™t be criticized.  Iâ€™ve taken the position that your criticism (a la Coultergeist) is ludicrous.  Cindy believes she is fasting and making a statement.  Who are you to tell her that she isnâ€™t especially since youâ€™ve been affected as much as she has been by this war? </p>
<p>â€œhow dare you say that! her brother was a transvestite and died of AIDS! she is therefore beyond criticism for her gender identity.â€ </p>
<p>Now you get the point!  I still want to know if sheâ€™s working or walking.  Now you see when I criticize someone you respect how it hits a nerve.</p>
<p>â€œbut youâ€™ve missed the key part: itâ€™s still a MAJORITYâ€</p>
<p>Youâ€™ve missed the key part.  It was a majority.  Ainâ€™t no more!  Again letâ€™s see what happens in the midterms.  Maybe you guys should get Pete Coors to move to some State where Republicans are in trouble.</p>
<p>â€œmr. anan, youâ€™ve certainly got me all tangled up in your logic.â€ </p>
<p>At least my arguments are logical.  See above.</p>
<p>â€œa lot of french now thinkâ€¦â€</p>
<p>The difference was Clinton had faulty intelligence.  Bush created it.  Watch the frontline special.  Cheney pushed on George Tenet to produce the intelligence the administration wanted (i.e., the slam dunk case).  Bush even knew the intelligence about the yellow cake was flawed before he gave his state of the union address.  He knew all of the intelligence was flawed.  He is a liar.  Watch the frontline special.  Stop removing your brain from your head and believing as only a right wing nut job does.  Develop some critical thinking skills.</p>
<p>â€œbut thatâ€™s why weâ€™ve got to get saddam a good legal defense team and get him off the hook for genocide.â€</p>
<p>If you donâ€™t understand the significance of the Nuremberg trials and how they benefited the US (despite the risk) you really should study World History.</p>
<p>â€œthen iâ€™d wan to find out who lied, so i would be sure not to support them.â€</p>
<p>Bush lied.  Iâ€™ll get rid of anyone responsible for the leak, the yellow cake example, the aluminum centrifuge tubes, etc. etc. etc.  Critical thinking comes in handy. </p>
<p>â€œon a related note, did you defend bill clinton his brief bout with perjury?â€</p>
<p>No I didnâ€™t.  He should have been impeached.  So should Bush for lying and costing the American people so much.</p>
<p>â€œnothing. letâ€™s have fish smoothies for everyone!â€</p>
<p>Great. You buy.</p>
<p>Doug:<br />
â€œ1. Check out Code Pinkâ€™s fasting guidelines. These are the feminist nuts behind this fast/rolling fast nonsense. Even by their standardâ€™s Cindy Sheehanâ€™s â€œfastâ€ is a joke.â€</p>
<p>Explain the logic.  You give credibility to what Code Pink says and then you call them feminist nuts.  Explain the incongruity.</p>
<p>â€œ2. Has Bush accepted the Kyoto protocol? Uh, no.â€</p>
<p>Uh where were you during the 2000 elections.  He said he would support the Kyoto Protocol.  Again, he lied.</p>
<p>â€œ3. Michael Moore hates America and Americans. (The underlined blue text is a hyperlink. You can click on it and visit a page with additional information and evidence.)â€</p>
<p>Right wing propaganda.  You have to ignore this stuff.  Stick to the facts to develop critical thinking skills.<br />
â€œ4. Youâ€™re obsession with â€œEDâ€ is amusing.â€</p>
<p>No actually, I find hypocritical junkies like Rush Limbaugh amusing.</p>
<p>â€œ5. You present a compelling argument for mandatory military service and/or a requirement that any civilian who oversees military affairs must have served previously.â€</p>
<p>Thatâ€™s funny.  I donâ€™t remember doing that.  But one could imagine that civilian leadership might consult one who has served instead of making decisions based on what Karl Roveâ€™s brain says that day.</p>
<p>â€œ6. Yes. Israel has been fighting Islamic terrorism for â€œa little overâ€ 3,000 years. Quite a feat considering Mohammed was born around 570 AD, â€œa little underâ€ 3,000 years ago.â€</p>
<p>I donâ€™t think you read above.  The wikipedia entry was for terrorism not Islamic terrorism.  You seem to have an fetish for Islam.  Something you care to tell us.  I was actually assuming that Moses came around before 1000 BC.  I may be wrong, Iâ€™m not a scriptorian like you Doug.  Anyway, you missed my point.  They have been fighting terrorism for more than 3000 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: travis</title>
		<link>http://www.all-encompassingly.com/fasting-cindy-sheehan-style/comment-page-1/#comment-13010</link>
		<dc:creator>travis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 02:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.all-encompassingly.com/fastingcindy-sheehan-style/#comment-13010</guid>
		<description>mr. anan, would you call jared the subway guy&#039;s diet a fast?  if not, is it not a fast because he doesn&#039;t &lt;em&gt;call&lt;/em&gt; it a fast?  don&#039;t you think it&#039;s a little ridiculous to allow people such leeway with important definitions?  

&lt;blockquote&gt;

I pointed out the Catholic example and you summarily dismissed it

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

noooo.  i didn&#039;t summarily dismiss it.  i kindly provided an example to show how catholics fasting under the cindy sheehan method would sound ridiculous.  rather than &quot;summarily,&quot; i would prefer to call what i did &quot;quick&quot; and &quot;efficient.&quot;

&lt;blockquote&gt; 

You are right. I gleefully watched the twin towers fall. 

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

i didn&#039;t say that.  i said you have taken the ludicrous position that cindy sheehan cannot be criticized.  

&lt;blockquote&gt;

[coulter] may also be a transvestite (got some pretty bad adamâ€™s apple going on there).

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

how dare you say that!  her &lt;del&gt;sister&lt;/del&gt; brother was a transvestite and died of AIDS!  she may, therefore, never be criticized for her gender identity.  

&lt;blockquote&gt;

Winning the election by a few mere percentage points is hardly a solid majority

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

but you&#039;ve missed the key part:  it&#039;s still a MAJORITY

mr. anan, you&#039;ve certainly got me all tangled up in your logic.  you&#039;ve just claimed there are many definitions of &quot;fast&quot; (including, apparently, &quot;eating more healthfully&quot;) but while you expand that definition beyond recognition, you&#039;re now narrowing the definition of &quot;majority&quot; so winning doesn&#039;t even count anymore?  because it wasn&#039;t &quot;solid&quot; enough?  what happened to second place is the first loser?  you lost.  you&#039;ve lost several times in a row now.  

&lt;blockquote&gt;

I would say that the roughly 60% or so Americans who now say Iraq was a mistake is a solid majority. 

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

a lot of french now think letting the US make the louisiana purchase was a mistake, too.  mistakes suck.  even george bush admitted something to the effect of the intelligence being wrong.  you put the blame on him but (again returning to arguments that have long been worn out) clinton and congressional democrats made even stronger statements about iraq and saddam than some of the bush administration&#039;s statements.  everybody seems to be wrong now.  it&#039;s horrible.

but that&#039;s why we&#039;ve got to get saddam a good legal defense team and get him off the hook for genocide.  maybe he can team up with ahmedinejad in iran and they can form a new, super-peaceful islamic state where there is no death, killing, or WMD.  i can almost picture it now.  

&lt;blockquote&gt;

I donâ€™t know how you can support liars. Again the scripture about lying and hell.

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

i don&#039;t need a scripture to tell me that lying is bad.  lying is bad.  

does the scripture say &quot;people who believe liars or give aid and comfort to liars will be thrust down to hell?&quot;  if so, that would make me a little more instructive for me.  then i&#039;d wan to find out who lied, so i would be sure not to support them.  

on a related note, did you defend bill clinton during his brief bout with perjury?  

and not to nitpick, but since we&#039;re getting back into the nineties, how can you not remember who you voted for in 1996?  were there a lot more candidates that year than there normally are?  

&lt;blockquote&gt;

What can be more patriotic than trying to keep America as the greatest nation on earth?

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

nothing.  let&#039;s have fish smoothies for everyone!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mr. anan, would you call jared the subway guy&#8217;s diet a fast?  if not, is it not a fast because he doesn&#8217;t <em>call</em> it a fast?  don&#8217;t you think it&#8217;s a little ridiculous to allow people such leeway with important definitions?  </p>
<blockquote>
<p>I pointed out the Catholic example and you summarily dismissed it</p>
</blockquote>
<p>noooo.  i didn&#8217;t summarily dismiss it.  i kindly provided an example to show how catholics fasting under the cindy sheehan method would sound ridiculous.  rather than &#8220;summarily,&#8221; i would prefer to call what i did &#8220;quick&#8221; and &#8220;efficient.&#8221;</p>
<blockquote>
<p>You are right. I gleefully watched the twin towers fall. </p>
</blockquote>
<p>i didn&#8217;t say that.  i said you have taken the ludicrous position that cindy sheehan cannot be criticized.  </p>
<blockquote>
<p>[coulter] may also be a transvestite (got some pretty bad adamâ€™s apple going on there).</p>
</blockquote>
<p>how dare you say that!  her <del>sister</del> brother was a transvestite and died of AIDS!  she may, therefore, never be criticized for her gender identity.  </p>
<blockquote>
<p>Winning the election by a few mere percentage points is hardly a solid majority</p>
</blockquote>
<p>but you&#8217;ve missed the key part:  it&#8217;s still a MAJORITY</p>
<p>mr. anan, you&#8217;ve certainly got me all tangled up in your logic.  you&#8217;ve just claimed there are many definitions of &#8220;fast&#8221; (including, apparently, &#8220;eating more healthfully&#8221;) but while you expand that definition beyond recognition, you&#8217;re now narrowing the definition of &#8220;majority&#8221; so winning doesn&#8217;t even count anymore?  because it wasn&#8217;t &#8220;solid&#8221; enough?  what happened to second place is the first loser?  you lost.  you&#8217;ve lost several times in a row now.  </p>
<blockquote>
<p>I would say that the roughly 60% or so Americans who now say Iraq was a mistake is a solid majority. </p>
</blockquote>
<p>a lot of french now think letting the US make the louisiana purchase was a mistake, too.  mistakes suck.  even george bush admitted something to the effect of the intelligence being wrong.  you put the blame on him but (again returning to arguments that have long been worn out) clinton and congressional democrats made even stronger statements about iraq and saddam than some of the bush administration&#8217;s statements.  everybody seems to be wrong now.  it&#8217;s horrible.</p>
<p>but that&#8217;s why we&#8217;ve got to get saddam a good legal defense team and get him off the hook for genocide.  maybe he can team up with ahmedinejad in iran and they can form a new, super-peaceful islamic state where there is no death, killing, or WMD.  i can almost picture it now.  </p>
<blockquote>
<p>I donâ€™t know how you can support liars. Again the scripture about lying and hell.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>i don&#8217;t need a scripture to tell me that lying is bad.  lying is bad.  </p>
<p>does the scripture say &#8220;people who believe liars or give aid and comfort to liars will be thrust down to hell?&#8221;  if so, that would make me a little more instructive for me.  then i&#8217;d wan to find out who lied, so i would be sure not to support them.  </p>
<p>on a related note, did you defend bill clinton during his brief bout with perjury?  </p>
<p>and not to nitpick, but since we&#8217;re getting back into the nineties, how can you not remember who you voted for in 1996?  were there a lot more candidates that year than there normally are?  </p>
<blockquote>
<p>What can be more patriotic than trying to keep America as the greatest nation on earth?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>nothing.  let&#8217;s have fish smoothies for everyone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doug</title>
		<link>http://www.all-encompassingly.com/fasting-cindy-sheehan-style/comment-page-1/#comment-13007</link>
		<dc:creator>doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 01:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.all-encompassingly.com/fastingcindy-sheehan-style/#comment-13007</guid>
		<description>Anon,

1. Check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.codepinkalert.org/article.php?id=1043&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Code Pink&#039;s fasting guidelines&lt;/a&gt;.  These are the feminist nuts behind this fast/rolling fast nonsense.  Even by their standard&#039;s Cindy Sheehan&#039;s &quot;fast&quot; is a joke.

2. Has Bush accepted the Kyoto protocol? Uh, no.

3. Michael Moore &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.indcjournal.com/archives/000683.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;hates America and Americans&lt;/a&gt;.  (The underlined blue text is a hyperlink.  You can click on it and visit a page with additional information and evidence.)

4. You&#039;re obsession with &quot;ED&quot; is amusing.

5. You present a compelling argument for mandatory military service and/or a requirement that any civilian who oversees military affairs must have served previously.

6. Yes.  Israel has been fighting Islamic terrorism for &quot;a little over&quot; 3,000 years.  Quite a feat considering Mohammed &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammed#Summary&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;was born&lt;/a&gt; around 570 AD, &quot;a little under&quot; 3,000 years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon,</p>
<p>1. Check out <a href="http://www.codepinkalert.org/article.php?id=1043" rel="nofollow">Code Pink&#8217;s fasting guidelines</a>.  These are the feminist nuts behind this fast/rolling fast nonsense.  Even by their standard&#8217;s Cindy Sheehan&#8217;s &#8220;fast&#8221; is a joke.</p>
<p>2. Has Bush accepted the Kyoto protocol? Uh, no.</p>
<p>3. Michael Moore <a href="http://www.indcjournal.com/archives/000683.php" rel="nofollow">hates America and Americans</a>.  (The underlined blue text is a hyperlink.  You can click on it and visit a page with additional information and evidence.)</p>
<p>4. You&#8217;re obsession with &#8220;ED&#8221; is amusing.</p>
<p>5. You present a compelling argument for mandatory military service and/or a requirement that any civilian who oversees military affairs must have served previously.</p>
<p>6. Yes.  Israel has been fighting Islamic terrorism for &#8220;a little over&#8221; 3,000 years.  Quite a feat considering Mohammed <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammed#Summary" rel="nofollow">was born</a> around 570 AD, &#8220;a little under&#8221; 3,000 years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.all-encompassingly.com/fasting-cindy-sheehan-style/comment-page-1/#comment-12998</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 01:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.all-encompassingly.com/fastingcindy-sheehan-style/#comment-12998</guid>
		<description>Doug:
I mean, honestly, you sound like Ben Stiller (Greg) explaining to his future father-in-law how â€œanythingâ€ can be milked.
Well then I guess a Catholicâ€™s fast of fish on Friday must not fall in line with your definition of fast.  I think about a billion people disagree with you.  Again you wouldnâ€™t know because you Republicans donâ€™t know anything about sacrifice.
â€œTravis was clearly out of lineâ€¦â€
He was out of line.  Bush and Cheney didnâ€™t fund them properly either, faked the intelligence data, didnâ€™t have a clue about the insurgency (last throesâ€¦).  I could go on and on.  To blame Kerry for anything is absurd.  
Really the flip flop argument is old.  Bush flip flopped on the Kyoto protocol.  So big deal, people change their minds.  Whatâ€™s funny is how the flip flops have been forced on Bush because he is too stupid to figure them out (e.g., global warming, mission accomplished, no two-way talks, etc. etc. etc.).  Again, why do you guys defend a liar?
â€œIâ€™m not sure that Travis ever said thisâ€¦â€
Michael Moore is more of a patriot than liars like Bush and Cheney will ever be.  Those that enslave our children because of their own greed deserve to be called traitors.  Have you checked out how much you owe on the national debt lately?  What about your kids?  As I mentioned before, we are becoming enslaved to those financing the debt.  Thatâ€™s less and less likely to be ourselves (read Fishmanâ€™s China Inc.).
How about a Freudian analysis of people like Dole and Limbaugh?  Either Democrats have no problems there or they at least have the sense not to say they have ED.  The important analysis of the Bush tax cuts has already been given (how much has the national debt increased under him? What is our trade deficit with China?).  With Hugo Chavez, I think itâ€™s more important to figure out why his people love him than Cindy Sheehan.

Ryan:
â€œWell, the Iraq situation now is hard because the Islamic terrorists are playing a full court pressâ€¦â€

Really, and what were they doing before, half court press?  Iâ€™ve already told you how our presence in the world has been neutered by the Iraq war and other bungles by Bush and Co.  I canâ€™t tell what youâ€™re arguing with the wikipedia definition.  Cut and run.  I showed you a list of the biggest cut and runners ever.  Those wonderful republicans who avoided their duty to serve in the armed forces.  Maybe where you guys come from when you make a mistake you stick with it until itâ€™s an even bigger mistake.  Where I come from you fix the mistake.

Youâ€™re right about the Israelis.  They are really showing us.  Letâ€™s see, how long have they been showing us (a little over 3000 years).  Theyâ€™ve been wiped off the map a few times too.  They are really making progress right now arenâ€™t they?  Most believe it will have to come down to a prisoner exchange as happened last time.  But go ahead and believe that they are really whipping up on those terrorists and that this time they (the terrorists) will sue for peace.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug:<br />
I mean, honestly, you sound like Ben Stiller (Greg) explaining to his future father-in-law how â€œanythingâ€ can be milked.<br />
Well then I guess a Catholicâ€™s fast of fish on Friday must not fall in line with your definition of fast.  I think about a billion people disagree with you.  Again you wouldnâ€™t know because you Republicans donâ€™t know anything about sacrifice.<br />
â€œTravis was clearly out of lineâ€¦â€<br />
He was out of line.  Bush and Cheney didnâ€™t fund them properly either, faked the intelligence data, didnâ€™t have a clue about the insurgency (last throesâ€¦).  I could go on and on.  To blame Kerry for anything is absurd.<br />
Really the flip flop argument is old.  Bush flip flopped on the Kyoto protocol.  So big deal, people change their minds.  Whatâ€™s funny is how the flip flops have been forced on Bush because he is too stupid to figure them out (e.g., global warming, mission accomplished, no two-way talks, etc. etc. etc.).  Again, why do you guys defend a liar?<br />
â€œIâ€™m not sure that Travis ever said thisâ€¦â€<br />
Michael Moore is more of a patriot than liars like Bush and Cheney will ever be.  Those that enslave our children because of their own greed deserve to be called traitors.  Have you checked out how much you owe on the national debt lately?  What about your kids?  As I mentioned before, we are becoming enslaved to those financing the debt.  Thatâ€™s less and less likely to be ourselves (read Fishmanâ€™s China Inc.).<br />
How about a Freudian analysis of people like Dole and Limbaugh?  Either Democrats have no problems there or they at least have the sense not to say they have ED.  The important analysis of the Bush tax cuts has already been given (how much has the national debt increased under him? What is our trade deficit with China?).  With Hugo Chavez, I think itâ€™s more important to figure out why his people love him than Cindy Sheehan.</p>
<p>Ryan:<br />
â€œWell, the Iraq situation now is hard because the Islamic terrorists are playing a full court pressâ€¦â€</p>
<p>Really, and what were they doing before, half court press?  Iâ€™ve already told you how our presence in the world has been neutered by the Iraq war and other bungles by Bush and Co.  I canâ€™t tell what youâ€™re arguing with the wikipedia definition.  Cut and run.  I showed you a list of the biggest cut and runners ever.  Those wonderful republicans who avoided their duty to serve in the armed forces.  Maybe where you guys come from when you make a mistake you stick with it until itâ€™s an even bigger mistake.  Where I come from you fix the mistake.</p>
<p>Youâ€™re right about the Israelis.  They are really showing us.  Letâ€™s see, how long have they been showing us (a little over 3000 years).  Theyâ€™ve been wiped off the map a few times too.  They are really making progress right now arenâ€™t they?  Most believe it will have to come down to a prisoner exchange as happened last time.  But go ahead and believe that they are really whipping up on those terrorists and that this time they (the terrorists) will sue for peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
