Comments on: Iraq, the Arabs, the U.S., and Israel: Is there linkage between Kuwait and the “West Bank”? http://www.all-encompassingly.com/iraq-the-arabs-the-us-and-israel-is-there-linkage-between-kuwait-and-the-west-bank/ we still remember mitch hedberg Wed, 11 Jan 2012 18:03:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: chavez's idiot http://www.all-encompassingly.com/iraq-the-arabs-the-us-and-israel-is-there-linkage-between-kuwait-and-the-west-bank/comment-page-1/#comment-58014 chavez's idiot Thu, 02 Aug 2007 14:21:37 +0000 http://www.all-encompassingly.com/iraq-the-arabs-the-us-and-israel-is-there-linkage-between-kuwait-and-the-west-bank/#comment-58014 "Those who consider Saddam Hussein’s preposterous proposition that, in exchange for Iraq’s withdrawal from Kuwait, Israel should withdraw from the “West Bank” do not understand the political and military realities of the Middle East." Oh, FLAME must be referring to every nation in the world and their leaders then (besides Israel of course) since every nation in the world has been behind UN resolutions at one time or another, demanding that Israel withdraw from the occupied territories. This article makes the arguement that Saddam's proposal (this must be an old article) carries no merit on the basis of strategic value alone. Israel should not withdraw from it's illegal and immoral actions because they are a good ally to the US. It also uses the arguement that Israel is a good investment (for the military industrial complex that Eisenhower warned us about). Thus the article points out the utterly corrupt moral character of the US and Israeli relationship where law and order and justice are not considered, just strategy and profit. Sounds like the definition of a secret combination doesn't it. “Those who consider Saddam Hussein’s preposterous proposition that, in exchange for Iraq’s withdrawal from Kuwait, Israel should withdraw from the “West Bank” do not understand the political and military realities of the Middle East.”

Oh, FLAME must be referring to every nation in the world and their leaders then (besides Israel of course) since every nation in the world has been behind UN resolutions at one time or another, demanding that Israel withdraw from the occupied territories.

This article makes the arguement that Saddam’s proposal (this must be an old article) carries no merit on the basis of strategic value alone. Israel should not withdraw from it’s illegal and immoral actions because they are a good ally to the US. It also uses the arguement that Israel is a good investment (for the military industrial complex that Eisenhower warned us about). Thus the article points out the utterly corrupt moral character of the US and Israeli relationship where law and order and justice are not considered, just strategy and profit. Sounds like the definition of a secret combination doesn’t it.

]]>