Jan
2nd
2008
Ron Paul should be at the table
I doubt that Ron Paul would be a good president. His lack of ability to execute and administer would leave much to be desired, and would run the risk of being completely disastrous in a crisis.
Nevertheless, it is just plain bizarre that Paul is being excluded from the Fox News New Hampshire debate. Steve Benen of CBS News put it best:
Given that Paul has about twice as much support in New Hampshire than Thompson, he’s likely to finish ahead of Giuliani in Iowa, and he’s raised more money in the fourth quarter than any of them, it’s hard to understand how the Republican network can justify excluding Paul.
Indeed.
Hat tip: DrewM at Ace and Dan Flynn.
Leave a Reply
note: by commenting, you indicate that you have read and accept all-encompassingly's comment policy. please print it and keep a copy of the document in your wall safe along with your living will or advance directive.